In my first article, I explained what careful decision-making looks like. Sentencing is one of the places where that process matters most, and it is also one of the most scrutinized.
Sentencing is often the most visible and most scrutinized part of a criminal case. It is also one of the most carefully structured responsibilities I carry as a circuit court judge.
A sentence is not formed in a single moment, nor is it based on instinct or personal or public opinion. In my courtroom, it follows a deliberate process guided by Wisconsin law, the evidence presented in court, and the individual circumstances of each case.
In every criminal matter, my responsibility at sentencing begins with the record. I review the testimony and evidence introduced during the proceedings, the arguments of counsel, and any statements offered by victims. Sentencing must be grounded in what has been formally presented and tested in court, not in outside commentary or assumptions.
In many felony cases, I review a Presentence Investigation report, commonly referred to as a PSI. A PSI is prepared by trained professionals and provides detailed background information about the individual being sentenced. It may include prior criminal history, personal and family background, employment information, substance use history, risk assessments, and recommendations regarding supervision or treatment. While a PSI does not determine the outcome, I consider it carefully as part of a broader evaluation to ensure that sentencing decisions are informed and consistent.
Wisconsin law directs judges to consider several primary factors when imposing a sentence:
- The seriousness of the offense
- The character of the individual
- The need to protect the public
These are not abstract ideas. In my courtroom, they require careful evaluation in each case. The seriousness of the offense includes examining the specific conduct involved, not simply the charge itself, as well as the impact on victims and the community.
When I evaluate the character of the individual, I look at prior record, rehabilitative efforts, personal history, and acceptance of responsibility where appropriate. No two individuals come before the court with identical circumstances.
Protection of the public requires assessing risk and determining what conditions or consequences are necessary to promote safety while also encouraging lawful behavior moving forward.
In addition to these core factors, I may consider rehabilitation, deterrence, and accountability. Sentencing is not solely punitive; it is also forward-looking. A well-structured sentence should reduce the likelihood of future harm and promote long-term community safety.
Before imposing a sentence, I listen carefully to both attorneys and give individuals the opportunity to speak on their own behalf. I take victim impact statements seriously. Sentencing hearings can be emotional and difficult for everyone involved, and I work to ensure that the process remains orderly, respectful, and focused on the legal standards that govern my decision.
No two cases are identical. Even when charges appear similar on paper, the surrounding facts, the individual’s background, and the level of risk can differ significantly. That is why I approach sentencing with individualized consideration rather than automatic outcomes.
At the same time, consistency matters. Similar conduct should be treated in similar ways while still recognizing meaningful differences between cases. Preparation, review of the record, and clear explanation of reasoning are essential. When I announce a sentence, I explain how the statutory factors apply to the case before the court. Transparency promotes understanding, even when the outcome is difficult.
Sentencing decisions are subject to appellate review. That oversight reinforces my obligation to ground each decision in the law and articulate the reasoning clearly on the record.
In Washburn County, these decisions affect real people and real families. They affect victims seeking justice, defendants facing consequences, and a community that expects fairness and accountability. In the courtroom, I see firsthand the weight those moments carry for everyone involved. For that reason, I approach sentencing with care, preparation, and a clear understanding of its impact.
Sentencing is not about headlines or reaction. It is about applying the law carefully, weighing all relevant information, and reaching a decision that is lawful, reasoned, and protective of the public.
The goal is not severity for its own sake, nor leniency without basis. It is a sentence that reflects the seriousness of the conduct, respects the rights of all parties, protects the community, and upholds the integrity of the court and the record.
That is how sentencing decisions are made in my courtroom in Washburn County.
Angeline Winton-Roe | Circuit Court Judge | Washburn County
**Paid for by Committee Supporting Angeline Winton-Roe For Judge**
Last Update: Feb 25, 2026 10:23 am CST
